Potential Resource-Pages (for RADIOMETRIC DATING) to help people
who are asking "What does science say about the age of our world?"

This is a temporary page.  It's intended to be useful during the process of selecting useful pages for the Origins Questions website (*), but it will also be useful if you just want to learn about the topics.    {* If you want to be part of the "process of selecting" by evaluating pages and providing feedback, read the reviewer's page.}

Here are some VIEWING TIPS:
to improve your understanding,
read pages in both columns, left (young earth) and right (old earth);
if you use a smaller font size, the two-column table will behave better in your browser;
italicized links are inside-the-page, non-italicized links open a new page in a new window;
AIG-linked is a non-AIG page linked to by AIG, AIG-YE-claim is in AIG's page for Young Age Evidence;
words in [square brackets] are my page-description (not their page-title) or my editorial comments;
titles in brown (on left side) were chosen by Ashby Camp for his links-page at TrueOrigins.org, and
titles in green & purple (on right side) are brief responses from Neyman & Isaak, as explained here.

Topics with Semi-Red Titles (and pages in topic preceded by "ē") are in the homepagefor AGE-SCIENCE.
Topics with Green Titles (and pageswith "ē") will (eventuallybut not yet) be in RADIOMETRIC DATING - Age of the Earth.

Within each section, pages are organized using multiple criteria:  SIZE (shorter pages are earlier) plus READABILITY and/or VISUAL APPEAL (better is earlier), QUALITY (based on my quick non-expert evaluations; better pages are earlier, but this is often trumped by other factors), SOURCE (for example, YE pages by ICR and AIG are usually early, since they're prominent YE organizations), and SUB-TOPIC or AUTHOR (by grouping these pages together).

more age-science:  There are similar two-column pages listing "potential resources" for Noah's Flood and Geology and Astronomy.

TOPIC-CATEGORIES in this page:
Overviews   miscellaneous   short-lived isotopes   RATE   —   Woodmorappe critiques   Inaccurate Dates   Faster Decay Rates   Radiometric & Geology   —   Carbon 14   K–Ar   Ar–Ar   Lu–Hf   U–Th–Pb   Isochron Method   Helium Diffusion   Fission Tracks   Polonium Halos

The current links-page for radiometric dating — underdeveloped and needing expansion— is RADIOMETRIC DATING: AGE OF THE EARTH & UNIVERSE.



This page is in a more "rough and incomplete" form than the other three potential-resource pages — for Noah's Flood, Geology, and Astronomy — so (as a reminder) it has a GRAY BACKGROUND.




Support for an OLD EARTH & UNIVERSE

RADIOMETRIC DATING — general overviews

AIG-ABook - How accurate is Carbon-14 dating? [and other types] * http://answersingenesis.org/docs2002/carbon_dating.asp  and same text but w added pics & links in http://christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c007.html

Chadwick, Various Questions Re: Radiometric Dating * http://origins.swau.edu/q&a/radio/default.html is now http://origins.swau.edu/q_and_a/radio/default.html

Clyde Webster, Genesis and Time: What Radiometric Dating Tells Us * http://grisda.org/georpts/gr21_01.htm

Taylor - Various Questions Re: Radiometric Dating * http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-radioactive.html

Pitman - [big]  Radiometric Dating Methods * http://naturalselection.0catch.com/Files/radiometricdating.html

Woodmorappe, National Geographic magazine joins the dating game * http://trueorigin.org/natgeo_jw01.asp and is also in AIG, http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v16/i1/dating_game.asp

Walker - The Dating Game [C-14 + more, w pomo]  http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v26/i1/game.asp


Plaisted, The Radiometric Dating Deception * http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/deception.html

1 - Plaisted, The Radiometric Dating Game (response to Henke-page, w radiometric & tree rings, coral reefs,… & geology) * http://trueorigin.org/dating.asp
2 - Henke, comments on #1 (Plaisted’s “Radiometric Dating Game) http://www.tim-thompson.com/plaisted-review.html
3 – Plaisted email (with Henke replies) http://www.tim-thompson.com/plaisted-review3.html
4 Plaisted, Reply to [#2] Dr. Henke and Others (Re: Radiometric Dating) * http://trueorigin.org/henke1.asp
5 – Henke, comments on #3 (Plaisted’s reply-to-Henke) http://www.tim-thompson.com/plaisted-review2.html

RADIOMETRIC DATING — general overviews

Wiens [shorter, 34 k, in first part of page] - http://reasons.org/resources/fff/2001issue07/index.shtml#dynamics_of_dating

Wiens - [111 k] Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective  http://asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens.html

An Essay on Radiometric Dating by Jonathon Woolf by http://www.jwoolfden.com/rad_dat.html

Roberts - radiometric survey (Part 1 is in "overview" section) http://lordibelieve.org/time/age4.PDF

Dalrymple - principles http://talkorigins.org/faqs/dalrymple/scientific_age_earth.html

Dalrymple - responses http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dalrymple/radiometric_dating.html#h8

Lindsay - consistency between methods  http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/crater_chain.html

Neyman - Ch 2 of "T not B" (RATE) - intro & 10 links to Wikipedia   http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter2.htm

Neyman - Review of "Answers Book" Ch 4 [survey, re: C-14, radiometric, and more]  http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/answersbook/abc4.htm


Woody - Lord Kelvin revisited on the young age of the earth (Technical) AIG-YE-claim http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v13/i1/kelvin.asp



EH - cosmic rays & radiation [category?] http://www.geocities.com/earthhistory/tcn.htm

Neyman - bad dates, halos, etc  http://answersincreation.org/radiohalos.htm

BIG links-page [lots to check!]  http://www.tim-thompson.com/radiometric.html

short-lived isotopes are missing

Is Young-Earth Creationism a Heresy? [OE for No-AiG] http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/is_yec_heresy_jm.htm

Sarfati - Is the absence of short-lived radionuclides a problem for the Biblical timescale  [this is very small part of page] (Semi-Technical) http://answersingenesis.org/home/area/feedback/negative_17December2001.asp

short-lived isotopes are missing

short-lived isotopes are missing -- http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/isotope_list.html

Short-lived isotopes Th-230 and U-236 exist on the moon.   http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CF/CF220.html


RATE * brief intro plus links to pages that are in other sections of this page, labeled (RATE)  http://icr.org/rate/

and three reviews from AIG:

Oard - overview/review of RATE-book [2000], Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i2/radiodating.asp

Lisle - RATE research reveals remarkable results—a fatal blow to billions of years [2005, re: "Thousands not Billions" conference] http://answersingenesis.org/docs2005/1107rate.asp

RATE Posters at AGU Conference  http://icr.org/research/index/researchp_aguconference/



Isaac - PSCF June-07 (available soon)

Neyman - end of review [re: conclusions] of RATE-book, "Thousands not Billions" http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter11.htm

Meyers (from IBSS) - review of RATE-book, Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth, http://www.bibleandscience.com/science/radioisotopes.htm

Kevin Henke - non-open bias in YE science  http://answersincreation.org/rats_rate.htm and (similar theme) in http://answersincreation.org/rats.htm

Meert [2003] - http://gondwanaresearch.com/rate.htm

Ross (on radio) with Rana, Bontrager, + Wiens -- http://www.reasons.org/resources/multimedia/rtbradio/archives_creation_update/200307-12archives.shtml#20030918

Neyman - RATE -- http://answersincreation.org/rate_nonsense.htm

Neyman - http://answersincreation.org/rate.htm

Neyman [2006] - re: JMorris early in RATE [1997]  http://answersincreation.org/rebuttal/icr/drjohn/drjohn_104.htm

Neyman - review of RATE-book, Thousands… not Billions [and chapter-reviews are in appropriate sections]  http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_review.htm

Epic Idiot - review of RATE-video, Radioisotopes & the Age of The Earth - http://www.epicidiot.com/evo_cre/vr_radioisotopes_age_earth.htm



Woodmorappe & Morton, Shimmerich, Henke

Woody - Glenn R. Morton’s Misuse of Woodmorappe’s List Of Discrepant Isotopic Dates http://trueorigin.org/ca_jw_02.asp


Woodmorappe & Morton, Shimmerich, Henke

Morton-Woody-Morton:  1. first part of http://home.entouch.net/dmd/age.htm   2. http://www.trueorigin.org/ca_jw_02.asp  3. http://home.entouch.net/dmd/woodrad.htm

Shimmerich-Woody-Shim  1. http://talkorigins.org/faqs/woodmorappe-geochronology.html  2. http://talkorigins.org/faqs/woodgeo/wood1.html  3. http://talkorigins.org/faqs/woodgeo/schimm1.html

Henke - re: Lu-Hf in w-99  http://answersincreation.org/distortion.htm

Henke - re: U-Pb in w-99  http://answersincreation.org/henke_woodmorappe_references.htm

Henke - misquotations http://answersincreation.org/misquote_woodmorappe.htm

Henke - discarding data?  http://answersincreation.org/billgoods.htm

more Woody is in K-Ar and Ar-Ar sections

inaccurate dates

[these are mixed into other sections, to criticize specific methods]

Williams - Flaws in dating the earth as ancient http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i1/earth.asp


inaccurate dates

Lindsay - http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/anomalous.html

Radiometric dating gives unreliable results  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G12_creation_science.htm
Radiometric dating gives unreliable results. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD010.html

Consistency of radiometric dating comes from selective reporting  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G115_creation_science.htm
Consistency of radiometric dating comes from selective reporting. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD020.html

Neyman - Are Dating Techniques Accurate?  http://answersincreation.org/dating.htm

Neyman - [title says “radiohalos” but…]  http://answersincreation.org/radiohalos.htm

Neyman - RATE & Deception  http://answersincreation.org/ratedeception.htm

Neyman - Review of RATE-book, Ch 7 [re: wrong dating] http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter7.htm
Neyman - Review of T-not-B, Ch 8 [case studies]  http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter8.htm

super-fast decay rates

Wieland-2003 (re: RATE, acknowledges "there were many independent lines of evidence that suggested that huge amounts of radioactive decay had indeed taken place" but earth is young so "there must have been speeded-up decay"  http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v26/i2/radiometric.asp and similar from 2003,  http://answersingenesis.org/docs2003/0821rate.asp

Walker, Radioactive Decay Rate Depends on Chemical Environment *  http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v14/i1/decay_rate.asp

Woodmorappe, Billion-fold Acceleration of Radioactivity Demonstrated in Laboratory * (Semi-Technical) http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i2/acceleration.asp

Chaffin, A Mechanism for Accelerated Radioactive Decay * http://creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/37/37_1/chaffin/acceldecay.html

Chaffin, Accelerated Decay: Theoretical Models * http://icr.org/pdf/research/RATE_ICC_Chaffin.pdf


super-fast decay rates

Henke - YEs admit extensive decay  http://answersincreation.org/rate_admit.htm

Radiometric dating falsely assumes that rates are constant  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G114_creation_science.htm
Radiometric dating falsely assumes that rates are constant.  http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CF/CF210.html

Physical constants are only assumed constant. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE410.html

Cosmic rays and free neutrinos affect U and Ar decay rates  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G113_creation_science.htm
Cosmic rays and free neutrinos affect U and Ar decay rates. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD004.html

Neyman - Ch 9 (Theories of Accelerated Nuclear Decay) http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter9.htm

evidence for constancy of constants (rad-decay...)  http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/constant_evidence.html

Meert - Were Adam & Eve Toast?   http://gondwanaresearch.com/hp/adam.htm

Neyman-quote -  "Woodmorappe's Billion-fold Distortion of 187Re Radioactive Decay or How Young-Earth Creationists Misapply Conditions in the Cores of Hot Massive Stars to their 'Genesis Earth' " 

radiometric dating & geology

Snelling - Radioisotope dating of rocks in the Grand Canyon  http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v27/i3/canyon.asp

Walker - The way it really is: little known facts about radiometric dating [re: geology & pomo circular logic] --  http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v24/i4/radiometric.asp

Lubenow - The pigs took it all [re: fossils & pomo-circular] http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i3/pigs.asp


Snelling, The Fallacies of Radioactive Dating of Rocks * [re: basalt flows in Grand Canyon] http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/radioactive-dating

Snelling, Radioisotope Dating of Grand Canyon Rocks * [re: basalt-amphibolites] (RATE) http://icr.org/article/42/108/

Snelling, Isotope Systematics and Recent Andesite Flows * [re: Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd, Pb-Pb ratios] http://icr.org/pdf/research/ICCMt_Ngauruhoe-AAS.pdf

Snelling, Dating of Somerset Dam * http://icr.org/pdf/research/ICCSOMERSETDAM_2-AAS.pdf

radiometric dating & geology

Neyman - Radioisotope Dating of Rocks in the Grand Canyon http://answersincreation.org/rebuttal/magazines/Creation/2005/article_v27_i3_grand_canyon.htm

Radiometric dating falsely assumes rocks are closed systems  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G111_creation_science.htm
Radiometric dating falsely assumes rocks are closed systems.   http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD001.html

Radiometric dating falsely assumes initial conditions are known  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G112_creation_science.htm
Radiometric dating falsely assumes initial conditions are known. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD002.html

strata & radiometry -- http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/confirm.html

TO-faq - Radiometric Dating and the Geological Time Scale - http://talkorigins.org/faqs/dating.html

KBS Tuff shows the flaws of radiometric dating  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G141_creation_science.htm
KBS Tuff shows the flaws [inconsistent dates] of radiometric dating. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD031.html




Baumgardner - Carbon Dating Undercuts Evolution's Long Ages  (RATE) -- http://icr.org/article/117/

Baumgardner and others, Measurable 14C in Fossilized Organic Materials [RATE] * http://icr.org/pdf/research/RATE_ICC_Baumgardner.pdf

Baumgardner (re: some C-14 in “old things” in RATE) http://globalflood.org/earthage/index.html

C-14 -- http://globalflood.org/papers/2003ICCc14.html

Snelling - Stumping old-age dogma  http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i4/dogma.asp

Aardsma, Myths Regarding Radiocarbon Dating * http://icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=293

Giem, Carbon 14 Dating Models * http://grisda.org/origins/24050.htm

Giem, Carbon-14 Content of Fossil Carbon * http://grisda.org/origins/51006.htm

Brown, Carbon 14 Dating * http://www.creation-science-prophecy.com/C14.htm

Pitman, Carbon-14 * http://naturalselection.0catch.com/Files/carbon14.html

Hasel, Recent Developments in Near Eastern Chronology and Radiocarbon Dating * http://grisda.org/origins/56006.pdf

TREE RINGS AND C-14 (below)

Batten, Tree Ring Dating (dendrochronology) * AIG-YE-claim http://answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/docs/tree_ring.asp

Brown - Can Tree Rings Be Used to Calibrate Radiocarbon Dates? * http://grisda.org/origins/22047.htm

Major - Dating in Archaeology: Radiocarbon & Tree-Ring Dating * http://www.apologeticspress.org/rr/rr1993/r&r9310a.htm

Brantley - Dating in Archaeology: Challenges to Biblical Credibility * http://www.apologeticspress.org/defdocs/rr1993/r&r9311a.htm

bad C-14 dates

Snelling, Dating Dilemma: Fossil Wood in ‘Ancient’ Sandstone * http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v21/i3/fossilwood.asp

Snelling, Young Radiocarbon Date for Ancient Fossil Wood * [in limestone] AIG-YE-claim http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i2/geology.asp

Snelling, Radioactive ‘Dating’ in Conflict * [fossil wood in basalt] http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i1/dating.asp and original technical article http://answersingenesis.org/Home/area/magazines/TJ/docs/TJ_v14n2_Crinum.pdf

Stutz - Dating in Conflict (fossil-wood in sandstone) http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i2/dating.asp



Lindsay - http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/carbon.html

Mark Aardsma (linked-to by Neyman) in 4 parts:
basics http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_method.php
precise? http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_precision.php 
assumptions http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_assumptions.php 
bad dates? http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_results.php

Ross [pessimistic about C-14]  http://reasons.org/resources/apologetics/carbon14.shtml

Morton - C14 & algae layers  http://home.entouch.net/dmd/suigetsu.htm

c14-website http://www.c14dating.com/int.html [plus links at bottom: Measurement, Applications,...]

TO - Hunt, residual C-14  http://talkorigins.org/faqs/c14.html

Neyman - Review of "Thousands not Billions" (RATE), Ch 3  http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter3.htm

Neyman -  http://answersincreation.org/rebuttal/icr/drjohn/drjohn_115.htm

Neyman (re: Wieland-1979) http://answersincreation.org/rebuttal/magazines/Creation/1979/article_v2_i2_carbon_dating.htm

Neyman (re: Hovind) http://answersincreation.org/rebuttal/cse/cse_carbon_dating.htm

pscf - Duff, C-14 & Lead Deposition - http://asa3.org/ASA/PSCF/1999/PSCF3-99Duff.html

bad C-14 dates

C-14 method is wrong because it is not adjusted for the flood  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G12111_creation_science.htm

Carbon dating gives inaccurate results  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G121_creation_science.htm
Carbon dating gives inaccurate results. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011.html

Variable C-14/C-12 ratio invalidates C-14 dating  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1211_creation_science.htm
Variable C-14/C-12 ratio invalidates C-14 dating. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_1.html

Vollosovitch and Dima mammoths yielded inconsistent C-14 dates  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1212_creation_science.htm
Vollosovitch and Dima mammoths yielded inconsistent C-14 dates. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_2.html

Living snails were C-14 dated at 2,300 and 27,000 years old  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1213_creation_science.htm
Living snails were C-14 dated at 2,300 and 27,000 years old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_3.html

A freshly killed seal was C-14 dated at 1,300 years old  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1214_creation_science.htm
A freshly killed seal was C-14 dated at 1,300 years old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_4.html

Triassic wood from Australia was dated at 33,000 years old  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1215_creation_science.htm
Triassic wood from Australia was dated at 33,000 years old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_5.html

Ancient coal and oil are C-14 dated as only 50,000 years old  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1216_creation_science.htm
Ancient coal and oil are C-14 dated as only 50,000 years old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_6.html

K-Ar (excess Argon)

Doolan - How do you date a New Zealand volcano? http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v13/i1/volcano.asp

Snelling, Radioactive ‘Dating’ Failure * [old age for recent lava flow] – condensed http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i1/dating.asp and long version * AIG-linked (Technical) http://icr.org/research/index/researchp_as_r01/

Austin, Excess Argon at Mount St. Helens * http://icr.org/research/index/researchp_sa_r01/

Snelling, Excess Argon: The ‘Achilles Heel’ of Dating Volcanic Rocks * AIG-linked  http://icr.orgarticle/436

Snelling, Crystal Rocks and the Problem of Excess Argon (RATE) * AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/438/

Swenson & Austin - Excess Argon within Mineral Concentrates from the New Dacite Lava Dome at Mt St Helens volcano – short/popular version (by Swenson) http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i3/radiodating.asp  and original  (by Austin) http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v10/i3/argon.asp

Brown, Radioisotope Age * http://grisda.org/georpts/gr20_01.htm

K-Ar (excess Argon)

K-Ar dating gives inaccurate results for modern volcanic rocks  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1231_creation_science.htm
K-Ar dating gives inaccurate results for modern volcanic rocks. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD013.html

Neyman - review of "Grand Canyon" Ch 6 [re: K-Ar dating of volcanic in GC]  http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/monument/c6.htm

Lindsay - dating young lava  http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/hawaii.html

K-Ar dates of 1986 dacite from Mount St. Helens are very old  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1232_creation_science.htm
K-Ar dates of 1986 dacite from Mount St. Helens are very old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD013_1.html

Henke - Mount Saint Helens Dacite Dating [K-Ar & Ar-Ar] http://answersincreation.org/dacite.htm

Henke - K-Ar dating of volcanos  http://answersincreation.org/blind.htm

Henke - re: K-Ar in w-99  http://answersincreation.org/hidingnumbers.htm

Henke - re: K-Ar [by Austin & Snelling] in w-99  http://answersincreation.org/henke_woodmorappe_shell.htm




Henke - Ar/Ar & K-Ar in w-99  http://answersincreation.org/chop_title.htm

Henke - Ar-Ar Errors & Monitoring http://answersincreation.org/ar39ar40.htm

Henke - Woody's Shotgun Attack  http://answersincreation.org/shotgun.htm




Henke - Woody's distortions http://answersincreation.org/distortion.htm


Snelling, The Failure of U-Th-Pb 'Dating' at Koongarra, Australia *  http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v9/i1/dating.asp

Snelling, Dubious Radiogenic Pb Behavior Places U-Th-Pb Mineral Dating in Doubt* * (Semi-Technical) AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/462

Snelling - The age of Australian uranium http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v4/i2/uranium.asp



The U-Th-Pb method, properly corrected for neutron capture gives recent dates  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1261_creation_science.htm
The U-Th-Pb method, properly corrected for neutron capture, gives recent dates. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD016.html

U-Th dating gives inaccurate results for modern volcanic rocks  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1221_creation_science.htm
U-Th dating gives inaccurate results for modern volcanic rocks. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD012.html

Henke - what Woody ignores  http://answersincreation.org/henke_woodmorappe_references.htm

Henke - Pb isotopes & age of earth  http://answersincreation.org/lead.htm

isochron method

[this is one of 4 main aspects of RATE]

Snelling - Radioactive dating method ‘under fire’ [re: isochron]  http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i2/radioactive.asp

Austin & Snelling, Discordant Potassium-Argon Model and Isochron Ages* [K-Ar and Rb-Sr] http://icr.org/research/index/researchp_sa_r03

Overn, Isochron Rock Dating is Fatally Flawed * http://tccsa.tc/articles/isochrons2.html

Plaisted, Problems With Isochrons * http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/isochron.html

Snelling, U-Th-Pb Dating: An Example of False Isochrons * http://icr.org/research/index/researchp_as_uthpbdating


Snelling and others [differing isochrons shows that decays were accelerated] * http://icr.org/pdf/research/ICCBassRapidsSill_2-%20AAS_SA_and_WH.pdf

Rb-Sr ISOCHRONS (below)

Austin, Excessively Old ‘Ages’ for Grand Canyon Lava Flows*  AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/353 

isochron method

[we need a good introductory explanation of what method is, how & why it works]

Isochron dating gives unreliable results  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1241_creation_science.htm
Isochron dating gives unreliable results. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD014.html

Isochron date of young Grand Canyon lava is excessively old  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1242_creation_science.htm
Isochron date of young Grand Canyon lava is excessively old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD014_1.html

TO - Stassen - isochron dating  http://talkorigins.org/faqs/isochron-dating.html

pscf - Davis Young - re: isochrons & more (March 2007, not yet on web)

Rb-Sr ISOCHRONS (below)

TO - Stassen - ICR Grand Canyon Project - http://talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-science.html

Neyman - Woodmorappe Can't Read Rb-Sr Diagrams [isochrons] http://answersincreation.org/woodmorappe_diagrams.htm

zircons — helium diffusion

Humphreys - A Tale of Two Hourglasses AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/3131/78/

Humphreys, Nuclear Decay:  Evidence for a Young World (RATE) * AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/302/

1 - Humphreys -  New RATE Data Support a Young World  http://icr.org/article/114/
2 - Humphreys and others, Helium Diffusion Age of 6,000 Years Supports Accelerated Nuclear Decay * http://creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/41/41_1/Helium.htm
3 - Henke, Young-Earth Creationist Helium Diffusion Dates [re: #1 and 2] http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/original.html
4 - Humphreys, Helium Evidence… Remains Crystal-Clear [re: #3 by Henke] * http://trueorigin.org/helium01.asp
5 - Henke - [re: #4 by Humphreys] http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/zircons.html
6 - Humphreys, Helium Evidence… Overcomes Pressure [re: #5 by Henke] http://trueorigin.org/helium02.asp
7 - Henke [re: #6 by Humphreys] http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/appendixc.html and http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/appendixd.html

Russ Humphreys vs Joe Meert (with intro by Sarfati) http://answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1030meert.asp

RATE - Helium diffusion rates support accelerated nuclear decay (RATE) (Technical) by Humphreys, Austin, Baumgardner, Snelling AIG-linked available in HTML http://globalflood.org/papers/2003ICChelium.html and PDF  http://icr.org/pdf/research/Helium_ICC_7-22-03.pdf

zircons — helium diffusion

[this is part of RATE so it's discussed in that section]

Zircons retain too much helium for an old earth  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1251_creation_science.htm
Zircons retain too much helium for an old earth. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD015.html

Christman - critique of RATE's Zircon-Helium Diffusion Project  http://answersincreation.org/RATE_critique_he-zr.htm

Neyman - review of RATE-book, Thousands not Billions, Ch 4  http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter4.htm

Neyman - re: the Henke-Humphreys series (see below) and YE persuasion-methods  http://answersincreation.org/helium.htm

TO-faq - Henke - this is #4 in a complex series of replies & counter-replies at the left, which I'll try to clarify;  in the heading and first paragraph, he links to #1 (several papers you can find at his link to "Humphreys 2003"), #2 (his original article, but he recommends reading #4), #3 (Humphrey-2005, a reply to #2), #5 (Humphrey, January 2006, a reply to #3), and #6 (Appendices C and D by Henke, July 2006)  http://talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/zircons.html

zircons — fission tracks


zircons — fission tracks

Neyman - review of RATE-book, Thousands not Billions, Ch 6  http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter6.htm


Walker - New radiohalo find challenges primordial granite claim  http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i1/radiohalo.asp

Taylor & Macintosh & Walker - [radiohaloes in coalified wood] AIG-YE-claim  http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i4/geologictime.asp

Snelling, Polonium Radiohalos: Still ‘A Very Tiny Mystery’ * (Semi-Technical) AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/471

Snelling - Radiohalos: Significant And Exciting Research Results , Ph.D. (RATE) (evidence of accelerated decay during Flood year, Semi-Technical) AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/301/108/

Snelling - Polonium Radiohalos: The Model for Their Formation Tested and Verified , Ph.D. (RATE) http://icr.org/article/2467/108/

Armitage - New record of polonium radiohalos, Stone Mountain granite, Georgia http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i1/radiohalos.asp

Snelling & Armitage, Radiohalos: A Tale of Three Granitic Plutons * in HTML http://globalflood.org/papers/2003ICCradiohalo.html and PDF http://icr.org/pdf/research/ICCRADIOHALOS-AASandMA.pdf

Helder - It’s about time [bio of Robert Gentry] http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v10/i2/time.asp


Polonium haloes indicate a young earth  http://answersincreation.org/argument/G131_creation_science.htm
Polonium haloes indicate a young earth.  http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CF/CF201.html

TO-faq - intro for next 2 pages  http://talkorigins.org/faqs/po-halos
TO - Bailleul  http://talkorigins.org/faqs/po-halos/gentry.html
TO - Brawley  http://talkorigins.org/faqs/po-halos/violences.html

Wakefield - geology of halo-rocks  http://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/gentry/tiny.htm

Neyman - review of RATE's "T not B" Ch 5  http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter5.htm

Neyman - summary   http://answersincreation.org/polonium.htm

Deem - summary  http://godandscience.org/youngearth/polonium.html